Tag Archives: AAL

Historical CAT Insured Losses – an update.

I was recently doing some research on the specialty insurance sector again, a topic I posted regularly on in the past. I googled historical insured catastrophe losses and a response from Google’s AI model Gemini included an old exhibit I had posted on this blog in 2013. I am in two minds about the result, chuffed that something I posted 12 years ago is still being used but perplexed why an exhibit that was so out of date would be relevant! A subject for another day…..

Anyway, the below exhibit updates the inflated insured catastrophe losses from 1990 to 2024 (with Swiss Re’s estimate for 2025). The trend is clearly upwards with the new 10-year average at $130 billion and the 5-year average at $140 billion. This is a significant change from the $60 billion 10 year average in the 2013 post!

As I have highlighted many times previously here, inflated losses (i.e. bringing historical costs into today’s value) are not a true indicator of current risks as the historical losses need to be exposure adjusted (i.e. historical events run through models with today’s exposure date).

An excellent recent example of this is from a recent paper by Karen Clark & Co called “The $100 Billion Hurricane” which runs each historical US hurricane through 2025 exposures, as below.

The paper concludes that “there is no significant upward trend in hurricane losses, and the US has been lucky over the past few decades”.

Two different angles of looking at historical data albeit that it’s undeniable that catastrophe losses, both by economic and insured value, in aggregate each year are only going in one direction.

Let’s hope the remainder of the 2025 US hurricane season doesn’t show us that the single $100 billion hurricane loss was overdue!

​​​​

AIG: Better Days

It’s been 2 years since I posted on AIG and it has been an eventful 2 years. A new management team (again) has been installed, led by industry veteran Brian Duperreault, to try to turn this stubborn ship around. The results, as below, show the scale of the task. Reduced investment returns, reducing legacy and asset balances, and poor reinsurance protections are just a few of the reasons behind the results, in addition to the obvious poor underwriting results.

click to enlarge

Oversize risks from the previous Go Large strategy have been disastrous for both the catastrophic losses and reserve strengthening on the commercial P&C business, as the results below show. Duperreault and his team have been busy working on refocusing the underwriting philosophy, modernizing systems and analytics, bringing in talent (including buying Validus), redesigning reinsurance protections and reshaping the portfolio.

click to enlarge

In their latest quarterly call, the new management team is boldly predicting an underwriting profit on the general insurance business (commercial and consumer) in 2019, assuming a catastrophe load of less than 5% and reductions in loss and expense ratios, which will require a +10% improvement in the 2018 result. In a sector where competitors have long since evolved (some use AI to optimise their portfolios and returns) and the alchemy of low return capital providers is ever present, they have set themselves an aggressive target.

click to enlarge

Given the current share price just below $42, its trading around 76% of the adjusted book value. If all things go well, and some recent headwinds (e.g. reserve strengthening) are tamed, I can see how a pre-tax income target of $3.5 billion to $4 billion and an adjusted income diluted EPS of $4.00 to $4.50 is achievable. These targets are roughly where analysts are for 2019, returning to EPS results achieved over 5 years ago. I concur on the targets but think the time-frame may be optimistic, another year of clean-up looks more likely.

It will be interesting to see how the year progresses.