People of my generation, like those before us no doubt, like to moan on about the quality of modern music. When I look back at the diversity of the music from the 1980’s that I grew up listening to, I cannot but help feel that this generation is missing out.
As it happens, the 2018 Global Music Report from IFPI indicated that the multi-year decline in global music revenues has bottomed out. The 2017 industry revenues grew by 8% over 2016, with streaming revenues up 41%. This represents three consecutive years of growth after many years of decline. The music sector is one of the earliest examples of the awesome creative destructive ability of the digital revolution, as the graph below shows.
click to enlarge
The physical, digital and streaming revenues are obvious (e.g. CDs & vinyl, downloads & streaming). Performance rights includes the revenues generated by the use of recorded music by broadcasters and public venues. Synchronisation revenues include the revenues from the use of music in advertising, film, games and television programmes.
As a regular theme of this blog is the impact of the digital revolution under way on so many industries and the need for sectors to adapt through digital transformation of their business models, the graph above is both thought provoking and scary.
Listening to the investment pitch by Spotify this week over the future of the sector, I can’t but help think that the democratisation and disintermediation promised by the internet age has resulted, for the music sector at least, in dominant players dictating homogeneous tastes and culture. The death of individualism seems to be the result, at least until this or future generations get fed up with it.
Posted in General
Tagged 2020 projections, advertising, creative destructive, death of individualism, democratisation, digital revolution, digital transformation, disintermediation, diversity, film, games, Generational Music, Global Music Report, homogeneous culture, IFPI, modern music, music digital revenues, music industry revenues, music sector, performance rights, RIAA, Spotify, streaming revenue, synchronisation revenues, television, vinyl records
This year’s Davos gathering is likely to be dominated by Donald Trump’s presence. I look forward to seeing him barge past other political and industry leaders to get his prime photo opportunity. As US equity markets continue to make all time highs in an unrelentingly fashion, it is scary to see the melt-up market been cheered on by the vivacious talking heads.
Ahead of Davos, the latest World Economic Forum report on global risks was released today. 59% of the contributors to the annual global risks survey point to an increase in risks in 2018, with environmental and cybersecurity risks continuing their trend of growing prominence, as can be seen below.
click to enlarge
Undoubtedly, environmental risks are the biggest generational challenge we face and it is hard to argue with the statement that “we have been pushing our planet to the brink and the damage is becoming increasingly clear“. That said, what is also striking about these assessments (and its important to remember that they are not predictions) is how the economic risks (light blue squares) have, in the opinion of the contributors, receded as top risks in recent years. The report does state that although the “headline economic indicators suggest the world is finally getting back on track after the global crisis that erupted 10 years ago” there is “continuing underlying concerns”. Amongst these concerns, the report highlights “potentially unsustainable asset prices, with the world now eight years into a bull run; elevated indebtedness, particularly in China; and continuing strains in the global financial system”.
A short article in the report entitled “Cognitive Bias and Risk Management” by Michele Wucker caught my attention. The article included the following:
Risk management starts with identifying and estimating the probability and impact of a given threat. We can then decide whether a risk falls within our tolerance limits and how to react to reduce the risk or at least our exposure to it. Time and again, however, individuals and organizations stumble during this process—for example, failing to respond to obvious but neglected high-impact “grey rhino” risks while scrambling to identify “black swan” events that, by definition, are not predictable.
One of the most pervasive cognitive blinders is the availability bias, which leads decision-makers to rely on examples and evidence that come immediately to mind. This draws people’s attention to emotionally salient events ahead of objectively more likely and impactful events.
I do wonder about cognitive blinders and grey rhinos for the year ahead.
Posted in General
Tagged black swan, Chinese economy, climate change, CO2 emissions, Cognitive Bias, cyber crime, cyber terrorism, cybersecurity risk, Davos 2018, disruptive technology, economic slowdown, elevated indebtedness, environmental risk, extreme weather, global financial system, global risks, global risks survey, global trends, globalization, grey rhino risks, income inequality, meltup market, Michele Wucker, nationalism, Paris Agreement, technological change, unsustainable asset prices, US equity markets, World Economic Forum
As I re-read my eve of 2017 post, its clear that the trepidation coming into 2017, primarily caused by Brexit and Trump’s election, proved unfounded in the short term. In economic terms, stability proved to be the byword in 2017 in terms of inflation, monetary policy and economic growth, resulting in what the Financial Times are calling a “goldilocks year” for markets in 2017 with the S&P500 gaining an impressive 18%.
Politically, the madness that is British politics resulted in the June election result and the year ended in a classic European fudge of an agreement on the terms of the Brexit divorce, where everybody seemingly got what they wanted. My anxiety over the possibility of a European populist curveball in 2017 proved unfounded with Emmanuel Macron’s election. Indeed, Germany’s election result has proven a brake on any dramatic federalist push by Macron (again the goldilocks metaphor springs to mind).
My prediction that “volatility is likely to be ever present” in US markets as the “realities of governing and the limitations of Trump’s brusque approach becomes apparent” also proved to be misguided – the volatility part not the part about Trump’s brusque approach! According to the fact checkers, Trump made nearly 2,000 false or misleading claims in his first year, that’s an average of over 5 a day! Trump has claimed credit for the amazing performance of the 2017 equity market no less than 85 times (something that may well come back to bite him in the years ahead). The graph below does show the amazing smooth performance of the S&P500 in 2017 compared to historical analysts’ predictions at the beginning of the year (see this recent post on my views relating to the current valuation of the S&P500).
click to enlarge
As for the equity market in 2018, I can’t but help think that volatility will make a come-back in a big way. Looking at the near unanimous positive commentators’ predictions for the US equity market, I am struck by a passage from Andrew Lo’s excellent book “Adaptive Markets” (which I am currently reading) which states that “it seems risk-averse investors process the risk of monetary loss with the same circuit they contemplate viscerally disgusting things, while risk-seeking investors process their potential winnings with the same reward circuits used by drugs like cocaine”. Lo further opines that “if financial gain is associated with risky activities, a potentially devastating loop of positive feedback can emerge in the brain from a period of lucky investments”.
In a recent example of feeding the loop of positive feedback, Credit Suisse stated that “historically, strong returns tend to be followed by strong returns in the subsequent year”. Let’s party on! With a recent survey of retail investors in the US showing that over 50% are bullish and believe now is a good time to get into equities, it looks like now is a time where positive feedback should be restrained rather than being espoused, as Trump’s mistimed plutocratic policies are currently doing. Add in a new FED chair, Jay Powell, and the rotation of many in the FOMC in 2018 which could result in any restriction on the punch bowl getting a pass in the short term. Continuing the goldilocks theme feeding the loop, many commentators are currently predicting that the 10-year treasury yield wouldn’t even breach 3% in 2018! But hey, what do I know? This party will likely just keep on moving through 2018 before it comes to a messy end in 2019 or even 2020.
As my post proved last year, trying to predict the next 12 months is a mugs game. So eh, proving my mug credentials, here goes…
- I am not even going to try to make any predictions about Trump (I’m not that big of a mug). If the Democrats can get their act together in 2018 and capitalize on Trump’s disapproval ratings with sensible policies and candidates, I think they should win back the House in the November mid-terms. But also gaining control of the Senate may be too big an ask, given the number of Trump strong-holds they’ll have to defend.
- Will a Brexit deal, both the final divorce terms and an outline on trade terms, get the same fudge treatment by October in 2018? Or could it all fall apart with a Conservative implosion and another possible election in the UK? My guess is on the fudge, kicking the can down the transition road seems the best way out for all. I also don’t see a Prime Minster Corbyn, or a Prime Minister Johnson for that matter. In fact, I suspect this time next year Theresa May will still be the UK leader!
- China will keep on growing (according to official figures anyway), both in economics terms and in global influence, and despite the IMF’s recent warning about a high probability of financial distress, will continue to massage their economy through choppy waters.
- Despite a likely messy result in the Italian elections in March with the usual subsequent drawn out coalition drama, a return of Silvio Berlusconi on a bandwagon of populist right-wing policies to power is even too pythonesque for today’s reality (image both Trump and Berlusconi on the world stage!).
- North Korea is the one that scares me the most, so I hope that the consensus that neither side will go there holds. The increasingly hawkish noises from the US security advisors is a worry.
- Finally, as always, the winner of the World Cup in June will be ……. the bookies! Boom boom.
A happy and health New Year to all.
Posted in Equity Market, General
Tagged 10-year US Treasury, 12 month trailing PE, 2017 review, 2018 FOMC, 2018 predictions, 2018 World Cup winner, Adaptive Markets, Andrew Lo, Brexit, Brexit trade deal, Brexit transition, China financial distress, corporate tax, Credit Suisse, Democrats, Donald Trump, economic growth, economic stimulus, Euro, euro breakup, euro collapse, European disintegration, European elections, European fudge, FED chairman, goldilocks year, happy new year, higher interest rates, inflation, Italian elections, Jay Powell, monetary policy, November mid-term elections, positive feedback, Prime Minister Johnson, Prime Minster Corbyn, punch bowl, rising inflation, risk-averse investors, risk-seeking investors, S&P 500 forecast, S&P 500 prediction, Silvio Berlusconi, stock market volatility, strong dollar, Theresa May
The OECD had an interesting piece on old age dependency ratios across countries, predicting that on average they would nearly double over the next 35 years for the 20-64 cohort, as per the graph below.
click to enlarge
Japan and Spain come out the highest in the 2050 projection, followed by Greece, Portugal, Italy and Korea. Interestingly, the countries that came out the lowest in the 2050 projection were Australia, the US, Turkey, Mexico and Israel.