Tag Archives: Buttonwood

A visit to the dentist

Last week, Raghuram Rajan, the current governor of the Indian Central Bank and the author of the excellent book Fault Lines, warned about asset prices and macro-economic policies in the developed world. Rajan said that things may work out if “we can find a way to unwind everything steadily” but added “it is a big hope and prayer” and that the reality of history is one of sudden movements and volatility. Also this week, hedge fund manager David Einhorn said that his fund was having “difficult time finding new investments this quarter” and that “as the market continues to rise in the face of conflicting economic data, global unrest, and looming overdue Fed exit from quantitative easing we remain cautiously positioned”.

As regular readers will know, I am also wary about valuations in the current market which seem to be largely driven by the lack of return as a direct result of macro-economic policy (see Buttonwood post). I am comforted by the fact that, as a part-time investor, I am not bound by the pressures that professional money managers have in the beauty parade that is the relative annual performance competition. So that affords me and other part-time investors (our own family offices in a way!!) the luxury of watching developments from the sidelines. Trying to find the holy grail of an undervalued stock in today’s market is unrealistic and fanciful in my opinion, given the resources of a lone investor at one’s disposal. So I tend to let my attention drift to whatever comes my way with the intention of broadening my mind and maybe broadening my list of stocks to keep an eye on.

That brings me to my visit to the dentist last week. My visit was primarily to get a new crown on a neglected tooth. I had rescheduled the appointment a number of times and as a result had not really thought about the procedure beforehand. Compared to a similar procedure a number of years ago, the process was totally different. First off, my mouth was scanned by a camera and a 3D image of my teeth was produced. I was then asked to wait in the reception for 20 minutes and upon my return the ceramic crown was ready having been produced in a milling machine onsite. The crown fit perfectly and was easily fitted. My dentist conducted the procedure using a new one-day crown system produced by a German firm called Sirona Dental Systems. The system includes a computer that takes digital images of the damaged tooth, software to design the crown and a milling machine. There have been some concerns about the use of such crowns for front teeth due to colouring issues or the suitability of such crowns for people who grind their teeth heavily. Within my mouth, I have a live comparative test of a laboratory fabricated crown and a new one day procedure produced one. It will be interesting to see how the new crown gets on!

I had previously heard about new technology that could impact the dental sector. A specially designed camera, fitted to a smart phone, can scan your mouth and then send a 3D image to a central database whereupon a panel of dental experts could diagnose the issue and then submit the recommended procedure to a marketplace of dentists to provide a quote on a solution. Naturally, my dentist was skeptical on diagnosing problems with a smartphone scan! Given my first experience with a scan, I think such ideas may have potential to disrupt a protected professional sector. As a further illustration of how technology is impacting medicine, this article on a new app that can turn a smartphone into a highly portable and low cost eye scanner to diagnose eye health issues in remote areas is interesting.

So I had a look at Sirona, ticker SIRO, who coincidentally reported quarterly results last week. SIRO’s year end is September and, based upon an estimate for Q4, revenue has grown on average by 9% for the last 3 years with operating income by 15%. The stock price has doubled over that time. The graph below shows the share price since 2007 and the 12 month trailing PE ratio and the next 12 months (current quarter and estimated next 3 quarters) PE estimate.

click to enlargeSIRO Share Price & Earnings Multiples

SIRO’s revenue is split into 4 main segments: dental CAD/CAM systems (such as the one I experienced), imaging systems, treatments centers, and instruments. The first two segments are the larger making up approximately 35% of revenue each and are the higher growth and margin segments. Each are described below:

  • Dental CAD/CAM systems address the market for dental restorations, which includes several types of restorations, such as inlays, onlays, veneers, crowns, bridges, copings and bridge frameworks made from ceramic, metal or composite blocks. SIRO estimates it has an approx 15% market share in US and Germany.
  • Imaging systems comprise a broad range of systems for diagnostic imaging in the dental practice. SIRO has developed a comprehensive range of imaging systems for 2D or 3D, panoramic and intra-oral applications that allow the dentist to accommodate the patient in a more efficient manner.
  • Treatment centers comprise a broad range of products from basic dentist chairs to sophisticated chair-based units with integrated diagnostic, hygiene and ergonomic functionalities, as well as specialist centers used in preventative treatment and for training purposes.
  • SIRO offers a wide range of instruments, including handheld and power-operated handpieces for cavity preparation, endodontics, periodontology and prophylaxis, which are regularly updated and improved.

The graph below shows the historical segment & geographical revenue split and the historical operating margin.

click to enlargeSIRO Revenue Split & Op Margins

The growth in operating results is impressive, as is their balance sheet and cashflow. The issue is one of valuation with SIRO trading around 26 times this year’s earnings and about 20 times next year’s projected earnings. However, despite SIRO having some major competitors, they are growing their highest margin segments impressively and, in the vein of Peter Lynch’s philosophy of investing in what you know, I shall be putting SIRO on my watch list to keep an eye on them whilst I do some more research (the most obvious of which is seeing how my crown gets on!!) and wait for a better entry point.

Speaking of valuations, my dental experience did get me thinking about the much hyped 3D printing sector. The number of applications for 3D printing continues to grow from construction, to aerospace, to medical/dental, to fashion, to biotech, to a whole host of industrial design applications. Wohlers Associates project a CAGR of 30% for the sector over the next few years (I’d love to know on what basis these guys come up with their projections). I had a brief look over two of the most hyped firms in the sector – Stratasys Ltd (SSYS) and 3D Systems (DDD). Historical comparisons are difficult as both companies have been aggressive acquirers. SSYS has had more favourable results of late compared to DDD due to SSYS acquisition of MakerBot and to DDD’s recent stumble due to heavy investments in growth. A quick snapshot of some metrics since 2011 are in the graphs below.

click to enlargeSSYS & DDD Share price revenues and earnings multiples

With SSYS and DDD trading at 36 and 40 times next year’s projected earnings respectively, these firms are not for the faint hearted. Hyper growth stories in new sectors are normally areas outside my comfort zone due to the inherent uncertainties. In this case my experience at the dentist may mean I will do some more digging in the future of this new technology, time permitting. For the sake of curiosity if nothing else.

New valuation realities

As the market pulls back again this week in a much-needed dose of worry about where QE is leading us and how it will end, there is another interesting article from Buttonwood in this week’s Economist. Based upon work of analysts in investment banks BNP Paribas, Société Générale, and Goldman Sachs (Andrew Lapthorne of SG does high quality analysis and his work generally makes for insightful reading), the article highlights how valuations based upon price to book ratios have broken with pre-crisis history and currently differentiate more acutely between “quality” stocks (depending upon varying criteria as applied by the said analysts).

The article highlights the limited pool of “quality” stocks no-matter what criteria is used and Buttonwood also makes a point (which I fully agree with), namely that “investors have been flocking to equities because interest rates are so low; some, perhaps, on the naive view that using a lower discount rate on future cashflows translates into higher share prices today“.

As readers of this blog will be aware, two sectors that I follow are the wholesale insurance and the alternative telecom sectors. In previous posts, I have presented my historical valuation metrics for both sectors (albeit from limited samples) and they are combined in the graph below (one based upon price to tangible book, the other an EV/ebitda metric). The alternative telecom sector is as far away from any “quality” stock criteria that one could imagine and would be in the lowest quintile (on volatility alone!) of any sensible criteria. Although results are volatile by definition in the wholesale insurance sector, some of the bigger names like Munich Re may get higher ratings, maybe a 2 or 3 on Buttonwood’s graph.

click to enlarge

wholesale insurer & altnet valuation metric comparison

The main point I am trying to make in this post is that relying on valuations returning to levels prior to the financial crisis for certain sectors is just not realistic or sensible. Unless the market goes into fantasy land on the upside (this may seem idle speculation given the market’s current mood but just think where sentiment was a few short weeks ago), the differentiation currently been made in the market between business models and their inherent volatility is rational. The worry, as the article points out, is that there is not enough “quality” stocks around currently to wet the appetite of hungry investors and historically that has been a negative indicator for future stock returns.

Does financial innovation always end in reduced risk premia?

Quarterly reports from Willis Re and Aon Benfield highlight the impact on US catastrophe pricing from the new capital flowing into the insurance sector through insurance linked securities (ILS) and collaterised covers. Aon Benfield stated that “clients renewing significant capacity in the ILS market saw their risk adjusted pricing decrease by 25 to 70 percent for peak U.S. hurricane and earthquake exposed transactions” and that “if the financial management of severe catastrophe outcomes can be attained at multiple year terms well inside the cost of equity capital, then at the extreme, primary property growth in active zones could resume for companies previously restricting supply”.

This represents a worrying shift in the sector. Previously, ILS capacity was provided at rates at least equal to and often higher than that offered by the traditional market. The rationale for a higher price made sense as the cover provided was fully collaterized and offered insurers large slices of non-concentrated capacity on higher layers in their reinsurance programmes. The source of the shift is significant new capacity being provided by yield seeking investors lured in by uncorrelated returns. The Economist’s Buttonwood had an article recently entitled “Desperately seeking yield” highlighting that spreads on US investment grade corporate bonds have halved in the past 5 years to about 300bps currently. Buttonwood’s article included Bill Gross’s comment that “corporate credit and high-yield bonds are somewhat exuberantly and irrationally priced”. As a result, money managers are searching for asset classes with higher yields and, by magic, ILS offers a non-correlating asset class with superior yield.  Returns as per those from Eurekahedge on the artemis.bm website in the exhibit below highlight the attraction.

ILS Returns EurekahedgeSuch returns have been achieved on a limited capacity base with rationale CAT risk pricing. The influx of new capital means a larger base, now estimated at $35 billion of capacity up from approximately $5 billion in 2005, which is contributing to the downward risk pricing pressures under way. The impact is particularly been felt in US CAT risks as these are the exposures offering the highest rate on lines (ROL) globally and essential risks for any new ILS fund to own if returns in excess of 500 bps are to be achieved. The short term beneficiaries of the new capacity are firms like Citizens and Allstate who are getting collaterised cover at a reduced risk premium.

The irony in this situation is that these same money managers have in recent years shunned traditional wholesale insurers, including professional CAT focussed firms such as Montpelier Re, which traded at or below tangible book value. The increase in ILS capacity and the resulting reduction of risk premia will have a destabilising impact upon the risk diversification and therefore the risk profile of traditional insurers. Money managers, particularly pension funds, may have to pay for this new higher yielding uncorrelated asset class by taking a hit on their insurance equities down the road!

Financial innovation, yet again, may not result in an increase in the size of the pie, as originally envisaged, but rather mean more people chasing a smaller “mispriced” pie. Sound familiar? When thinking of the vast under-pricing of risk that the theoretical maths driven securitisation innovations led to in the mortgage market, the wise words of the Buffet come to mind – “If you have bad mortgages….they do not become better by repackaging them”. Hopefully the insurance sector will avoid those mistakes!