Category Archives: Economics

Size of notional CDS market from 2001 to 2012

Sometime during early 2007 I recall having a conversation with a friend who was fretting about the dangers behind the exponential growth in the unregulated credit default swap (CDS) market. His concerns centred on the explosion in rampant speculation in the market by way of “naked” CDS trades (as opposed to covered CDS where the purchaser has an interest in the underlying instrument). The notional CDS market size was then estimated to be considerably higher than the whole of the global bond market (sovereign, municipal, corporate, mortgage and ABS). At the time, I didn’t appreciate what the growth in the CDS market meant. Obviously, the financial crisis dramatically demonstrated the impact!

More recently the London Whale episode at JP Morgan has again highlighted the thin line between the use of CDS for hedging and for speculation. Last week I tried to find a graph that illustrated what had happened to the size of the notional CDS market since the crisis and had to dig through data from the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) to come up with the graph below.

click to enlarge

Size of notional CDS market 2001 to 2012

Comparing the size of the notional CDS market to the size of the bond market is a flawed metric as the notional CDS market figures are made up of buyers and sellers (in roughly equal measures) and many CDS can relate to the same underlying bond. Net CDS exposures are only estimated to be a few percent of the overall market today although that comparison ignores the not inconsiderable counterparty risk. Notwithstanding the validity of the comparison, the CDS market of $25 trillion as at the end of 2012 is still considerable compared to the approximate $100 trillion global bond market today. The dramatic changes in the size of both the CDS market (downward) and the bond market (upward) directly reflect the macroeconomic shifts as a result of the financial crisis.

The financial industry lobbied hard to ensure that CDS would not be treated as insurance under the Dodd-Frank reforms although standardized CDS are being moved to clearing houses under the regulations with approximately 10% of notional CDS being cleared in 2012 according to the ISDA. The other initiative to reduce systemic risk is portfolio compression exercises across the OTC swap market whereby existing trades are terminated and restructured in exchange for replacement trades with smaller notional sizes.

Although the industry argues that naked CDS increase the liquidity of the market and aid price discovery, there is mixed research on the topic from the academic world. In Europe, naked CDS on sovereign bonds was banned as a result of the volatility suffered by Greece during the Euro wobbles. The regulatory push of OTC markets to clearing houses does possibly raise new systemic risks associated with concentration of credit risk from clearing houses! Other unintended consequences of the Dodd Franks and Basel III regulatory changes is the futurization of swaps as outlined in Robert Litan’s fascinating article.

Anyway, before I say something silly on a subject I know little about, I just wanted to share the graph above. I had thought that the specialty insurance sector, particularly the property catastrophe reinsurers, may be suited for a variation on a capital structure arbitrage type trade, particularly when many such insurers are increasingly using sub-debt and hybrid instruments in their capital structures (with Solvency II likely to increase the trend) as a recent announcement by Twelve Capital illustrates. I wasn’t primarily focussed on a negative correlation type trade (e.g. long equity/short debt) but more as a way of hedging tail risk on particular natural catastrophe peak zones (e.g. by way of purchasing CDS on debt of a overexposed insurer to a particular zone). Unfortunately, CDS are not available on these mid sized firms (they are on the larger firms like Swiss and Munich Re) and even if they were they would not be available to a small time investor like me!

Lessons not learnt and voices unheard

There have been some interesting articles published over the past week or so to mark the five year anniversary of the Lehman collapse.

Hank Paulson remembered the events of that chaotic time in a BusinessWeek interview. He concluded that despite having a hand in increasing the size of the US banks like JP Morgan and Bank of America (currently the 2nd and 3rd largest global banks by tier 1 capital) “too big to fail is an unacceptable phenomenon”. He also highlighted the risk of incoherence amongst the numerous US and global regulators and that “more still needs to be done with the shadow-banking markets, which I define to be the money-market funds and the so-called repo market, which supplies wholesale funding to banks”.

Another player on the regulatory side, the former chairman of the UK FSA Adair Turner, continued to develop his thoughts on what lessons need to be learnt from the crisis in the article “The Failure of Free Market Finance”, available on the Project Syndicate website. Turner has been talking about these issues in Sweden and London this week (which essentially follow on from his February paper “Debt, Money and Mephistopheles: How Do We Get Out Of This Mess?”). where he argues that there are two key issues which need to be addressed to avert future instability.

The first is how to continue to delever and reduce both private and public debt. Turner believes that “some combination of debt restructuring and permanent debt monetization (quantitative easing that is never reversed) will in some countries be unavoidable and appropriate”. He says that realistic actions need to taken such as writing off Greek debt and a restructuring of Japanese debt. The two graphs below show where we were in terms of private debt in a number of jurisdictions as at the end of 2012 and show that reducing levels of private debt in many developed countries have been offset by increases in public debt over recent years.

click to enlarge Domestic Credit to Private Sector 1960 to 2012

Public and Private Debt as % of GDP OECD US Japan Euro Zone

The second issue that Turner highlights is the need for global measures to ensure we all live in a less credit fuelled world in the future. He states that “what is required is a wide-ranging policy response that combines more powerful countercyclical capital tools than currently planned under Basel 3, the restoration of quantitative reserve requirements to advanced-country central banks’ policy toolkits, and direct borrower constraints, such as maximum loan-to-income or loan-to-value limits, in residential and commercial real-estate lending”.

Turner is arguing for powerful actions. He admits that they effectively mean “a rejection of the pre-crisis orthodoxy that free markets are as valuable in finance as they are in other economic sectors”. I do not see an appetite for such radical actions amongst the political classes nor a consensus amongst policy makers that such a rejection is required. Indeed debt provision outside of the traditional banking systems by way of new distribution channels such as peer to peer lending is an interesting development (see Economist article “Filling the Bank Shaped Hole”)

Indeed the current frothiness in the equity markets, itself a direct result of the on-going (and never ending if the market’s response to the Fed’s decisions this week is anything to go by) loose monetary policy, is showing no signs of abating. Market gurus such as Buffet and Icahn have both come out this week and said the markets are looking overvalued. My post on a possible pullback in September is looking ever more unlikely as the month develops (S&P 500 up 4% so far this month!).

Maybe, just maybe, the 5th anniversary of Lehman’s collapse will allow some of the voices on the need for fundamental structural change in the way we run our economies to be heard. Unfortunately, I doubt it.